What is NaturalNews NaturalPedia? | Information for Authors Home | About Natural News | Contact Us | About the Consumer Wellness Center
NaturalNews.com > NaturalPedia > Genetically modified foods

Genetically modified foods

page 1 of 2 | Next -> Email this page to a friend

Want news about Genetically modified foods and more e-mailed to you? Click here for free email alerts

-->
The problem lies with the poor condition of our ecosystem, our appetite for cheap foods, plus the advent of genetically modified foods. Healthy soil contains insects and other life forms that crawl around, die, and thus replenish nutrients. Nowadays, however, crops are sprayed with pesticides that kill the insects and also poison our food and soil. Land should be given time to "rest" and replenish itself after certain harvests. However, rotating crops is rarely practiced anymore.
These toxins include genetically modified foods, pesticides (used to treat the crops), meat and dairy, soy, white flour, table salt, MSG (Monosodium Glutamate), microwaved foods, refined sugar, artificial sweeteners, caffeinated drinks (colas, coffee, etc.), and alcohol. At the end of each category, I provide you with a quick reference chart for the easiest way to eliminate or reduce your daily exposure to these toxins. Remember, preventing toxins from entering your body is the 126 2 c 0 u H z z 3 ¦-— < Synthesize: To artificially create something by combining individual elements.
How Do genetically modified foods Cause a Toxic Colon? Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) come from plants or ani-130 mals that have received new genetic material to achieve various results thought to be desirable. Experiments with the genetic makeup of diverse plant crops have led to resistance to pesticides, herbicides, and o insecticides, enhanced levels of nutrients, and even tolerance to extreme u w weather conditions. Common products derived from genetically modified plants include cottonseed oil, soybeans, cocoa beans, canola, and ~ corn.
With the multitudes of genetically modified foods out there, our body will become a host for numerous viruses that normally would never be found in us. Likewise, Leukemia virus in chicken has been used as a carrier to insert human genes into developing poultry. It gets better, or shall I say, worse. A retrovirus was used to insert human fetal cells in pigs in order to grow aortas for transplantation into humans. When the pig's aorta was transplanted into the human body, it led to infections in humans with the pig's retrovirus.
Since the body becomes what we feed it, genetically modified foods and produce will have a negative influence on one's cellular structure. Cenero-Active Substances These include: All heritage seed produce in the first half cycle of life. For example, young carrots, potatoes, smaller cabbages, fruits before they are overly mature, that is up to a few weeks old or so, according to the nature of the fruit and vegetable. Generally, all sprouts, including green sprouts. The quality of the water used will reflect the gv and wl potential. Most clean brook, well, and spring water. ?
However, ANZFA's own document 'GM Foods and the consumer, ANZFA's safety assessment process for genetically modified foods'clearly states that ANZFA considers that GE food is safe until proven unsafe, the opposite of the precautionary principle.
We also have entered an era of genetically modified foods, which are just that—genetically mutated foods that are not necessarily better for you. The health implications not only to humans but also to the environment is a hotly contested debate; the introduction of genetically altered food could have serious consequences, such as allergic reactions and increased resistance to certain antibiotics. Two of the prime targets for genetic engineering—soy and corn—are America's cash crops.
Every 24 hours, you may consume the following amounts of toxins in an average lifestyle: Toxins from Food: 325,000 White flour, sugar in desserts, hormones and antibiotics, soy, pesticides, genetically modified foods, MSG, hydrogenated oils, fast foods and cooked, boxed, canned, processed foods, etc. Toxins from Beverages: 160,000 Pasteurized milk, soft drinks, diet colas, "energy" (highly caffeinated) drinks, sports drinks, juice concentrates, coffee, alcohol, refined sugars, artificial sweeteners, artificial coloring, etc.
We are just beginning to hear that a massive mistake has been made with genetically modified foods, which can only fan those diabetic winds.28 Dr. Alpad Pusztai, for instance, has already shown that genetically-manipulated foods can, when fed to animals in reasonable amounts, cause very gradual organ and immune system damage.
Genetically Modified Food The terms "genetically modified organism" (GMO) and "genetically modified foods" (GM foods) refer to plants or animals whose genes have been changed in the laboratory by scientists. All living organisms have genes written in their DNA. They are the chemical instructions for building and maintaining life. By modifying the genes, scientists can alter the characteristics of an organism. In agriculture, genetic engineering allows simple genetic traits to be transferred to crop plants from wild relatives, other distantly related plants, or virtually any other organism.
Mike: You talk a lot about genetically modified foods, and why it's very important for us – not only as individuals, but even as societies – to really rethink this, so why is this important? You see people eating corn all the time. What's wrong with genetically modified corn? What do they care? Cousens: Most countries around the world have much resistance to it and why? Well, there are many levels on which it's a problem. There's the genetically modified corn, which may have human genes, fish genes, whatever.
Many of the reasonable concerns about genetically modified foods and animals come from this hit-or-miss aspect of biotechnology. Biological engineers take a more systematic approach, using an increasingly deep understanding of how DNA works to make microorganisms perform narrowly specified tasks. (The Massachusetts Institute of Technology now has a major in biological engineering, the school's first new major in decades.) Standardized, cheaper genetic engineering tools will lead to a better understanding of biological processes.
The biggest problem — that we know of, thus far — associated with genetically modified foods in terms of the immediate effect on human health is a dramatic increase in their allergenic potential. In terms of environmental concerns, genetically engineered organisms cross-pollinate with other non-GMO crops and the subsequent Hormone disrupters, like silent saboteurs, have invaded the highly sensitive endocrine systems of our children.
There is a big divide separating the continents, and it hits us powerfully when we learn about the European reaction to genetically modified foods. Years before Americans expressed concern about the safety of genetically modified foods, European consumers were actively questioning their use. While European companies have been among the leading developers of genetically engineered seeds—Novartis was a major innovator in GMOs—many of Europe's citizens have questioned their wisdom.
In 1998, Pusztai set off a furor regarding the safety of genetically modified foods when he disclosed that rats fed GM potatoes containing a lectin from a snowdrop plant suffered depressed immune systems and damage to the kidney, stomach, spleen and brain. The snowdrop lectin had been inserted into the potato because it is a naturally occurring insecticide.
Already there is a study that shows that when humans digest genetically modified foods, the artificially created genes transfer into and alter the character of the beneficial bacteria in the intestine. [Heritage 2004; Netherwood, et al, 2004] Similarly, gene transfer among genetically engineered agricultural crops and surrounding native species has given rise to highly resistant species deemed superweeds.
In addition, there is growing concern about the potential harm of irradiated and genetically modified foods. The bottom line for a health-promoting diet is to reduce the intake of these potentially harmful substances, foods laden with empty calories, additives, and artificial sweeteners, and replace them with natural foods, preferably organically grown and non-GMO. As for our water supply, its safety is also being scrutinized, for good reason. Check your water supply to make sure it is safe. If it isn't, invest in a home water purification unit that will remove the impurities.
The ruling represents the first large-scale defeat of genetically modified foods on unarguable scientific grounds, apart from ethical and ideological concerns," Epstein said. U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Codex officials said, however, the decision merely reflects the commission's preference to adopt standards by consensus. Also, in an Aug. 19 statement, the Animal Health Institute defended the safety of milk from cows treated with the hormone.
As importantly, the ruling represents the first large scale defeat of genetically modified foods on unarguable scientific grounds, apart from ethical and ideological concerns. Since the Food and Drug Administration approved the sale of unlabeled rBGH milk in March 1994, the U.S. has exerted considerable pressure on Mexico and other trading partners to approve rBGH in efforts to increase pressure on Europe through the World Trade Organization.
The fact that genetically modified foods were originally treated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a form of pesticide, and not food, suggests that the people registering them must have believed from the start that they would be potentially dangerous to our health. One study conducted by researchers from the Norwegian Institute of Gene Ecology found that villagers living near a GM maize field in the Philippines have suffered a range of illnesses.
Batalion in his document 50 Harmful Effects of genetically modified foods. He states, "The central problem underlying all of this technology is not just its short-term benefits and long-term drawbacks, but the overall attempt to 'control living nature based on an erroneous mechanistic view.' "9 GMOs give us crops that are bigger, stronger, and produce greater yields, yet at what cost? We are not just what we eat—we are what we ate.
His work centers on "health worry," everything from concerns about cell phones to environmental toxins to genetically modified foods. He has found a consistent connection between the degree to which a person worries about such things and individual complaints to doctors about chronic fatigue syndrome and food intolerance. As he notes, this phenomenon is relatively new.
The introduction of genetically modified foods (GMO) tampers with the essence of life in an experiment with an unknown outcome and no real way to undue the damage. The FDA purposely does not require labeling of GMO food, since no one who understands the issue would ever purchase it. This makes it all the more difficult to locate healthful food. In the fast-food livestock industry, animals live under inhumane conditions and require constant antibiotics to keep their diseases under control. They are fed synthetic growth hormone to rapidly increase their size.
In addition, anyone writing about genetically modified foods faced a basic problem of language. The phrase genetically modified is leaden and generally off-putting. So is the acronym GM. The word transgenic, which seems to be gaining popularity, neatly captures the idea of genes crossing between species, but all of these terms are liable to cause the brain to fog up and move elsewhere. I haven't come up with a solution to this problem, I'm sorry to say. In the book I've attempted to demystify the language, explain the science, and make sense of the scaremongering and the bland assurances.
Headlines blast us with seemingly disconnected events—about genetically modified foods, the World Trade Organization, food trade wars—but our hunger to know what all this really means is rarely satisfied. Such concepts as globalization, even persistent world hunger, remain abstractions for most of us, and understanding how all of this determines the quality of our lives and what we can each do about it—that's even less clear.
Years before Americans expressed concern about the safety of genetically modified foods, European consumers were actively questioning their use. While European companies have been among the leading developers of genetically engineered seeds—Novartis was a major innovator in GMOs—many of Europe's citizens have questioned their wisdom. Are Europeans just skittish consumers and veiled protectionists, looking out for their own business interests, or are they forward-thinking and appropriately cautious? To learn this part of the story, everyone tells us we must head to Greenpeace France.
I think of the first big consumer scare with genetically modified foods, in the year 2000: the nationwide recall on taco shells with accidental traces of genetically modified Starlink corn not approved for human consumption. Just to pinpoint the error required private-detective-level sleuthing, tracking a chain of multinational companies across states and international borders! Thirty years ago, my hunch was that food could be a great awakener— holding power like nothing else to open our eyes to what is amiss.
Like other average consumers in this growing debate, I did not set out with strong opinions about genetically modified foods. Nor do my views fit easily now into either camp. I am persuaded that the biotech harvest has considerable perils, if done too fast or without proper regulation, but I can also see that it has considerable promise to relieve pain and hunger for millions of people—if governments, industry, and overzealous sentries don't stand in the way.
America accused the cautious Europeans of persuading the Africans that genetically modified foods might be unsafe. In turn the Europeans suggested that the Americans were cynically trying to shove corn they could not sell elsewhere down the throats of starving Africans, and calling it charity. EU officials went to Zambia to explain that if Zambia grew GM corn, it would not affect the country's ability to export other agricultural products—vegetables, flowers, and coffee. Those products would be unaffected because they don't mate with corn. The U.S.
Instead he said that he would not eat genetically modified foods if he could help it, until there was more evidence about their safety. And then he added a bombshell: "It's very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs." The media pounced on his words. Phones at the Rowett Institute rang off the hook with calls from European government officials, green groups, and biotech industry representatives from all over the world.