--> Their job is to test crops for signs of genetic engineering.
Larry Keene, a representative of Growmark, a grain processing cooperative that sends grain down the Illinois, explained to me that any farmer who hopes to load his corn onto a ship headed downriver for export must first have it tested at the grain elevator.2' The testing has become an unavoidable step at the transit depots of U.S. agriculture. Testers of GMOs are the flip side of the auctioneers; the presence of the former has contributed to the rise of the latter. |  This research verified that genetic engineering can transfer allergenic proteins into crops.
A gene from a Brazil nut carried allergies into soybeans
Pioneer Hi-Bred wanted to create a soybean that had a more complete balance of protein. They inserted a gene from a Brazil nut into soy DNA to increase production of an amino acid (methionine). Although the soy was planned for use in animal feed, some would certainly end up in the human food chain. Since some people are allergic to Brazil nuts, the company had the soybean tested for allergenicity. | | Some environmentalists had even promoted genetic engineering as a means of decreasing the applications of toxic pesticides and relying on genetically engineered pest resistance instead. Proponents faced a challenge, however: how do you prove a negative, that genetically engineered crops are not unsafe? In the United States, Vice President Quayle's declaration had provided an important government imprimatur: the new food crops were essentially the same as naturally evolved varieties, so no special attention to their ecological or health consequences was warranted. | | A popular movement erupted in Europe against the introduction of genetic engineering into food.
The battle over Europe's GMO policy was really the first great transatlantic environmental fight. That policy was sketched out in the European Parliament, which devised a strategy for halting the spread of the new technology until its effects on the environment and human health could be more thoroughly understood. In 1998, a temporary moratorium was declared on the imports of any food or seeds containing genetically modified ingredients, so scientists could pursue further study. | | European farmers had the potential to make the difference for firms like Monsanto, DuPont, Pioneer, and others making a profit or turning a loss on their multi-billion-dollar investments in genetic engineering. Into her office, she recalled, came representatives from the U.S. State and Commerce departments, from the American Chamber of Commerce, from Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta, and Dow, the major producers of genetically engineered seed, three out of four of which are U.S. firms (Syngenta is Swiss). |  The authors continued: "the possibility for genetic engineering and aerosol transmission [of influenza] suggests an enormous potential for bioterrorism" The possible hostile abuse of influenza virus is seen as a very real threat by public health officials in the USA. $15 million was granted by the US National Institutes of Health to Stanford University to study how to guard against the flu virus "if it were to be unleashed as an agent of bioterrorism". Stanford University News Release 17 September 2003, (See: http://mednews.stanford.edu/ newsreleases html/2003/septrelease/bioterror%20flu. | | Do We Need genetic engineering?
The argument for genetic engineering of food is that while the world population continues to expand, the area of land available for food production is finite. If the world's population increases, food production must be increased. So proponents of GM foods argue that without its use there will not be enough food to meet the demands of future populations. |  In a New York Times article that holds that, "the era of large increases in life expectancy may be nearing an end," he asserts that, "there are no lifestyle changes, surgical procedures, vitamins, antioxidants, hormones, or techniques of genetic engineering available today with the capacity to repeat the gains in life expectancy that were achieved in the twentieth century."6
I believe that this conclusion could not be more wrong. It is based on the extrapolation of Second Stage science. |  There are no lifestyle changes, surgical procedures, vitamins, antioxidants, hormones, or techniques of genetic engineering available today that have been demonstrated to influence the processes of aging."
The brutal reality about aging is that it has only an accelerator pedal. We have yet to discover whether a brake exists for people. The name of the game is to keep from pushing the accelerator pedal so hard that we speed up the aging process. The average American, however, by living a fast and furious lifestyle, pushes that accelerator too hard and too much. |  Standardized, cheaper genetic engineering tools will lead to a better understanding of biological processes. This should allow scientists to avoid the unanticipated system interactions feared by knowledgeable opponents of biotech. Even if the technology is misused, the standardization of the process will make it easier to recognize and respond to accidents or malice.
As long as biological engineers approach their work with an appreciation for its ultimate effects, standardized components and rigorous design methodology could actually make the broader use of biotechnology a safer prospect. | | Barry Commoner, biologist, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems at Queens College
"G; enes can be ambiguous' in the sense that each of them can use differently its information to give more than one protein. This can be done through differential reading' the genetic message starting and ending at different points of the sequence, or through alternative splicing, i.e. shuffling of RNA exons giving rise to different mature RNAs from the same initial gene transcript.
—Marcello Buiatti, geneticist, University of Florence
1. | | The argument for genetic engineering of food is that while the world population continues to expand, the area of land available for food production is finite. If the world's population increases, food production must be increased. So proponents of GM foods argue that without its use there will not be enough food to meet the demands of future populations. This argument has some validity, but current techniques are not capable of expanding production that significantly, and the reality is that the primary reason for GM foods is to generate profits for large corporations seeking greater revenues. | | Barry Commoner, biologist, Center for the Biology of Natural Systems at Queens College
The proteins created by inserted genes will act exactly the same way in a new organism.
Foreign proteins may be folded improperly or become attached to other molecules, which could change their properties. Likewise, gene expression may be affected by the genetic disposition of a host organism, or even the environment.
"An incorrectly folded form of an ordinary cellular protein can under certain circumstances ... [duplicate itself] and give rise to infectious neurological disease. | | Patricia Piccinini's work deals with the ramifications of genetic engineering. Her "Mutant Genome Project" conjures up the LUMP (Lifeform with Unevolved Mutant Properties), a creepy "designer baby" created solely as a lifestyle accessory. "Protein Lattice" depicts lovely nude models interacting with mice that have human ears growing on their backs (a
A Banksy work on a West Bank section of the security wall that separates Israel and Palestine. case of art imitating a reality both fascinating and gruesome). | | Finally, we also respect the strong sentiment that genetic engineering is morally wrong as it implicates an attempt to modify nature beyond natural laws.
There does not seem to be a strong reason for GM foods, and the GM foods that have currently been introduced have not fulfilled their promise to reduce pesticide use or maintain the integrity of the environment. We therefore recommend choosing non-GM foods. | | In agriculture, genetic engineering allows simple genetic traits to be transferred to crop plants from wild relatives, other distantly related plants, or virtually any other organism.
Manipulating the genetics of foods is not new. Traditional crop and animal breeding has been practiced since the early domestication of crops and livestock. Through traditional breeding and crossbreeding methods, genes have been transferred with the goal of exhibiting particular desirable traits. |  Until one day something called genetic engineering hit our table, and I started investigating whether I wanted my kids to drink good old wholesome milk, or the genetically engineered milk.
I used to run a lab -- I did research, and I tried to take a pretty fair look at all of the controversies regarding genetic engineering. This was back in '94, and I started reading scientific journal articles about GMO milk. I started investigating, calling Monsanto and speaking with their scientists. One day it hit me -- after doing a week, a month, a year of investigations, it hit me -- it's milk, stupid! |  He emphasized that biotechnology and genetic engineering will make great contributions to health and agriculture with a phenomenal global impact. rBST improves the efficiency of milk production by supplementing production of the natural hormone. rBST milk does not contain any new genetic material, and the AMA has concluded that rBST has been "studied and studied and studied" without any evidence of mastitis or harm, and that rBST "milk is safe."
¦ Richard Phipps, Ph.D., Center for Dairy Research, Reading, U.K. |  Evidence is mounting that soy allergies are on the rise because of genetic engineering.
The York Nutritional Laboratories in England - one of Europe's leading laboratories specializing in food sensitivity found a 50% increase in soy allergies in 1998, the very year in which genetically engineered beans were introduced to the world market.
Kaayla T. Daniel, The Whole Soy Story
There are literally billions of dollars of influence in the edible oil industry that is promoting soy's use in natural medical circles so it's use can then be promoted in the general medical public. |  You cannot feed animals things like blood, slaughterhouse waste, manure and municipal garbage, and you cannot use untested and hazardous technologies like genetic engineering or fruit irradiation. The animals have to be raised on pasture -- which is their natural behavior -- where every day of the growing season, weather permitting, they are out on pasture eating grass and foraging as they have evolved to do. |  They understand that pesticide and mercury residues and hazardous technologies such as genetic engineering and food irradiation will be rejected if there are truthful labels required on food products. Industry-sponsored H.R. 4167 is gaining momentum and must be stopped! Act now! Preserve local and regional democracy and protect yourself and your family from unsafe food by sending an email or calling your Representative and urging them to vote "No" on H.R. 4167.
Please Take Action Now -- Send a Message to Your Congress Member in the House of Representatives to Vote "No" on H.R. 4167. |  Fornon-invasive genetic engineering.
•Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields induce currents in the bone fracture area, by causing Cal lous cells to absorb more Calcium with electromagnets driven by A.C. in pulse bursts 12 hours per day and in sleep. 80% success with a narrow band of low amperes/volts stimulatingde-differentiation of marrow and periosteal cells stimulating bone formation; and a wide band of higher amperes/voltage that works by irritation with free radicals inducing bone-forming matrix. | | However, when this comparison yielded statistically significant differences, the GE canola was then compared to the 'Westar range,' a database housed in Canada, presumably from canola grown over a number of years from a number of sites. Doing this permits differences due to soil, climate, etc. to creep in again. Moreover, proof should be provided for the assertion that the differences were due to the natural variation of the plant. It is normally the role of such things as the statistical test, the standard error and the 95% confidence interval of the mean to provide a measure of this. |  The threat of pesticides, the danger of animal products, soil demineralization and genetic engineering can no longer be ignored. Yesterday's cooked-food diet won't cut it today. The standard animal food, processed diet is a gamble; we never know what is truly in the food.
Let's look at this process as starting a new diet while avoiding implied limitations. This is not about denial. 99.99% of all the food on Earth is raw plant food. Eating a natural food diet is the ultimate freedom. There is such a variety of raw plant foods on this Earth it is astonishing. |  To this mix we add genetic engineering, which alters the milk in ways we don't yet understand. The milk itself is pasteurized and homogenized, which further weakens its prana. Such milk is a degenerated food filled with fear, the pain of death, and enslavement. There is very little prana in it, very little Love, and little true nourishment. Therefore, there is not much dairy that is a sattvic food. Instead, it is a more tamasic food, which reflects cruelty, pain, and lack of consciousness. This is symbolically reflected in the amount of pus cells per liter of milk. | | Cooking, and other forms of processing such as microwaving, irradiation, and genetic engineering, destroy the quality and components of the food (and we still don't know the full extent of this destruction). Cooking is not only risky business, but it significantly diminishes the amount of nutrients, vitamins, minerals, proteins, fats, organic acids, and other lesser-known phytonutrients such as bioflavonoids, which are key components for activating positive gene expression. Because the phytonutrients are active in live foods, they play a significant role in gene regulation. |  The guidelines establish clear organic labeling criteria, and specifically prohibit the use of genetic engineering methods, ionizing radiation, and sewage sludge for fertilization. organic chemicals Substances derived from living organisms, containing carbon. organic solvents A solvent is a liquid that dissolves a solute. The solvent is the component of the solution that is present in greater amount. Organic solvents include substances such as benzene, tetrachlomethylene, and turpentine. They are usually flammable materials and may pose certain physical and chemical hazards. |  Both of these techniques can be done on either native (naturally occurring) receptors, taken from specific tissues of specific animals, or on cloned receptors created with genetic engineering techniques. Yet another way to investigate hallucinogenic activity is more indirect: one trains rats to respond to a particular molecule, then one substitutes a different molecule to see if it produces the same response. When two drugs give the same behavioral effect, it is assumed that they are acting at the same receptor. This technique is called stimulus control. | | Epstein, a vocal environmentalist, has joined ranks with genetic engineering critic Jeremy Rifkin in criticizing the FDA and the four companies that make rBGH: American Cyanamid, Elanco (a subsidiary of Eli Lilly), Monsanto, and Upjohn. Earlier this year Epstein published a paper in the little known (and non-peer-reviewed) International Journal of Health Service charging that the FDA had abdicated its regulatory responsibility by relying on research done by industry and industry's "indentured academics. | | Genetic engineering of livestock." Science 244: 1281-1288, 1989.
6. Brown, D. L., et al. "Influence of sometribove USAN on the body composition of lactating cattle." J. Nutr. 119: 633-638, 1989.
7. Kronfeld, D.S. "BST milk safety." J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 195: 288-289,1989.
8. Mepham, T.B. "Criteria for the public acceptability of biotechnologi-cal innovations in animal production. In Biotechnology in Growth Regulation." edited by R.B. Heap. C. 6. Prosser and 6. F. Lamming, pp. 203-212. Butterworths, London, 1989.
9. Collins, J S. (Impro Inc., Minnetonka, Minn.). | |
Email this page to a friend
